participle taking the gender of its predicate
-
- Textkit Enthusiast
- Posts: 562
- Joined: Fri Jun 16, 2017 7:15 am
participle taking the gender of its predicate
I know that, as a rule, a participle takes the gender of its predicate (or object)--as in "οἶδε μὲν γὰρ οὐδεὶς τὸν θάνατον οὐδ’ εἰ τυγχάνει τῷ ἀνθρώπῳ πάντων μέγιστον ὂν τῶν ἀγαθῶν" (Plato, Apol. 29 a 6-8); yet I find it difficult logically to digest this rule, given that the participle's having a gender is due to its being an adjective, and the gender of an adjective is defined by the subject that it qualifies. Does anyone know of a way to logically justify the indicated participle gender rule? Thanks in advance.
- jeidsath
- Textkit Zealot
- Posts: 5332
- Joined: Mon Dec 30, 2013 2:42 pm
- Location: Γαλεήπολις, Οὐισκόνσιν
Re: participle taking the gender of its predicate
I wouldn't say that adjectives agree with a "subject," but with a substantive. The reason that we think of participles as similar to adjectives is that they always agree with a substantive themselves.
The interesting thing to me about that sentence, is why both μέγιστον and ὂν seem to be m. acc., or n. nom./acc., even though the subject of τυγχάνει looks like it should be θάνατος. Attraction to τὸν θάνατον? Or maybe I'm just misguided here.
The interesting thing to me about that sentence, is why both μέγιστον and ὂν seem to be m. acc., or n. nom./acc., even though the subject of τυγχάνει looks like it should be θάνατος. Attraction to τὸν θάνατον? Or maybe I'm just misguided here.
“One might get one’s Greek from the very lips of Homer and Plato." "In which case they would certainly plough you for the Little-go. The German scholars have improved Greek so much.”
Joel Eidsath -- jeidsath@gmail.com
Joel Eidsath -- jeidsath@gmail.com
-
- Textkit Enthusiast
- Posts: 562
- Joined: Fri Jun 16, 2017 7:15 am
Re: participle taking the gender of its predicate
exactly, it sure is. so, purely logically, the participle should be ὤν, not ὄν. yet, following the indicated rule, it agrees with μέγιστον, which is neuter nominative.jeidsath wrote:the subject of τυγχάνει looks like it should be θάνατος
that it agrees with a substantive, goes without saying. the question is which substantive: the one of which the participle is predicated (as of its subject) or the one which is predicated of the participle (as an object of the action that it signifies)?jeidsath wrote:I wouldn't say that adjectives agree with a "subject," but with a substantive
-
- Textkit Zealot
- Posts: 4791
- Joined: Fri Oct 18, 2013 2:34 am
Re: participle taking the gender of its predicate
Consider
ο θανατος εστι αγαθον, Death is a good
ο θανατος εστι μεγιστον των αγαθων, Death is the greatest of goods
ο θανατος τυγχανει ον παντων μεγιστον των αγαθων, Death is actually the greatest of all goods.
“Logic” may require ων, but Greek doesn’t. ων would read very oddly. If you must, you can say that the participle is attracted to the gender of the predicate.
ο θανατος εστι αγαθον, Death is a good
ο θανατος εστι μεγιστον των αγαθων, Death is the greatest of goods
ο θανατος τυγχανει ον παντων μεγιστον των αγαθων, Death is actually the greatest of all goods.
“Logic” may require ων, but Greek doesn’t. ων would read very oddly. If you must, you can say that the participle is attracted to the gender of the predicate.
Last edited by mwh on Mon Apr 09, 2018 2:20 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Textkit Enthusiast
- Posts: 562
- Joined: Fri Jun 16, 2017 7:15 am
Re: participle taking the gender of its predicate
exactly. except that i'm not sure why you put logic in quotation marks. i know of no modern language that has the same peculiarity. isn't this intriguing? BTW, my Latin is rather rusty, so would be grateful should anyone remind me how it stands there.mwh wrote:“Logic” may require ων, but Greek doesn’t.
-
- Textkit Zealot
- Posts: 4791
- Joined: Fri Oct 18, 2013 2:34 am
Re: participle taking the gender of its predicate
I added the end of my post while you were replying. "Attraction" is your answer. Greek is very fond of attraction.
-
- Textkit Enthusiast
- Posts: 562
- Joined: Fri Jun 16, 2017 7:15 am
Re: participle taking the gender of its predicate
Thanks, this does make sense.
-
- Textkit Zealot
- Posts: 4791
- Joined: Fri Oct 18, 2013 2:34 am
Re: participle taking the gender of its predicate
Let me correct myself. I don’t think I should have said that ὤν would read oddly in the sample sentence I gave (*ο θανατος τυγχανει ον παντων μεγιστον των αγαθων). But in Plato’s sentence (οἶδε μὲν γὰρ οὐδεὶς τὸν θάνατον οὐδ’ εἰ τυγχάνει τῷ ἀνθρώπῳ πάντων μέγιστον ὂν τῶν ἀγαθῶν) the participle is slipped in after πάντων μέγιστον (both neuter, and τῶν ἀγαθῶν neuter following), and in such circumstances the neuter is almost inevitable.
-
- Textkit Enthusiast
- Posts: 562
- Joined: Fri Jun 16, 2017 7:15 am
Re: participle taking the gender of its predicate
OIC. This brings the idea of "attraction" more clearly to light. Thanks!