Is there a ready way to distinguish ἰδέσθαι med or pas?

Here you can discuss all things Ancient Greek. Use this board to ask questions about grammar, discuss learning strategies, get help with a difficult passage of Greek, and more.
Post Reply
User avatar
ἑκηβόλος
Textkit Zealot
Posts: 969
Joined: Wed Aug 07, 2013 10:19 am
Contact:

Is there a ready way to distinguish ἰδέσθαι med or pas?

Post by ἑκηβόλος »

Is there a ready way to determine when ἰδέσθαι is middle "to see" or passive "to appear"? Is it just left up to an educated (best) guess in context?
τί δὲ ἀγαθὸν τῇ πομφόλυγι συνεστώσῃ ἢ κακὸν διαλυθείσῃ;

Hylander
Textkit Zealot
Posts: 2504
Joined: Mon Aug 17, 2015 1:16 pm

Re: Is there a ready way to distinguish ἰδέσθαι med or pas?

Post by Hylander »

ἰδέσθαι is middle. I'm not sure I've ever seen it to mean "seem" but I could be wrong.

In any event, it's not passive. The aorist passive of ὁράω is ὤφθην, infinitive ὀφθῆναι. The Greek equivalent of "appear" is usually φαίνομαι (passive).

Middle and passive for many verbs are often distinguished by context in the present and perfect systems, but aorist middle and passive have distinct forms.
Bill Walderman

User avatar
ἑκηβόλος
Textkit Zealot
Posts: 969
Joined: Wed Aug 07, 2013 10:19 am
Contact:

Re: Is there a ready way to distinguish ἰδέσθαι med or pas?

Post by ἑκηβόλος »

Is ἰδέσθαι the same verb as the following deponent verb?
εἴδομαι (Middle Liddel) wrote:1.Lat. videor, to be seen, appear, εἴδεται ἄστρα they are visible, appear Il.
2.c. inf. to appear or seem to be, τοῦτό μοι κάλλιστον εἴδεται εἶναι Od.; also with inf. omitted, τόγε κέρδιον εἴσατο id=Od.; also, εἴσατ᾽ ἴμεν he made a show of going, id=Od.
3.in strictly middle sense, c. dat., ἐείσατο φθογγὴν Πολίτηι she made herself like Polites in voice, Il.:—also to be like, id=Il.
τί δὲ ἀγαθὸν τῇ πομφόλυγι συνεστώσῃ ἢ κακὸν διαλυθείσῃ;

User avatar
ἑκηβόλος
Textkit Zealot
Posts: 969
Joined: Wed Aug 07, 2013 10:19 am
Contact:

Re: Is there a ready way to distinguish ἰδέσθαι med or pas?

Post by ἑκηβόλος »

Is principal part εἴδομαι attested outside the 3rd person singular, beside one 1st person singular in Moschus?
τί δὲ ἀγαθὸν τῇ πομφόλυγι συνεστώσῃ ἢ κακὸν διαλυθείσῃ;

Hylander
Textkit Zealot
Posts: 2504
Joined: Mon Aug 17, 2015 1:16 pm

Re: Is there a ready way to distinguish ἰδέσθαι med or pas?

Post by Hylander »

According to LSJ, middle pres. εἴδομαι is used to mean "seem" in epic and lyric, but aor. is εἰσάμην.

http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/tex ... Dei)%2Fdw1
Bill Walderman

RandyGibbons
Textkit Enthusiast
Posts: 465
Joined: Sat Mar 30, 2013 9:10 pm

Re: Is there a ready way to distinguish ἰδέσθαι med or pas?

Post by RandyGibbons »

Is there a ready way to determine when ἰδέσθαι is middle "to see" or passive "to appear"?
Hi ἑκηβόλος.

If I didn't know better, I could just as easily be persuaded that ἰδέσθαι in this fragment of Xenophanes (DK B32, from scholium BLT on Iliad 11.27) is passive as that it is middle:

ἣν τ’ Ἶριν καλέουσι, νέφος καὶ τοῦτο πέφυκε,
πορφύρεον καὶ φοινίκιον καὶ χλωρὸν ἰδέσθαι.

But the LSJ article Hylander links you to and Hylander himself are definitive: There is no passive ἰδέσθαι.
Is ἰδέσθαι the same verb as εἴδομαι?
No, not in usage, as Hylander again points out. But even as us non-specialists might suspect, etymologically related; see the lemmas εἶδος and ἰδεῖν in Chantraine and εἴδομαι and ἰδεῖν in Beekes.

Hylander
Textkit Zealot
Posts: 2504
Joined: Mon Aug 17, 2015 1:16 pm

Re: Is there a ready way to distinguish ἰδέσθαι med or pas?

Post by Hylander »

ἣν τ’ Ἶριν καλέουσι, νέφος καὶ τοῦτο πέφυκε,
πορφύρεον καὶ φοινίκιον καὶ χλωρὸν ἰδέσθαι.

This is a common idiom, with either active ἰδεῖν or middle ἰδέσθαι. The infinitive supplements an adjective, just like English "to see" or "to behold".

See LSJ *εἴδω :
1. see, perceive, behold, ὀφθαλμοῖσι or ἐν ὀφθαλμοῖσι ἰδέσθαι see before the eyes, Il.1.587, etc.; “ἰδεῖν ἐν ὄμμασιν” E.Or.1020; ἄγε, πειρήσομαι ἠδὲ ἴδωμαι well, I will try and see, Od.6.126, cf. 21.159; mark, observe, Il.4.476, Od.4.412, etc.: folld. by relat. clause, “ἴδωμ᾽ ὅτιν᾽ ἔργα τέτυκται” Il.22.450; “ἀλλ᾽ ἄγε θᾶσσον ἰδώμεθα ὅττι τάδ᾽ ἐστίν” Od.10.44: freq. in inf. after Subst. or Adj., θαῦμα ἰδέσθαι a marvel to behold, Il.5.725; “οἰκτραῖσιν ἰδεῖν” A.Pr.240; “ἐλεινὸς ἰδεῖν” Pl.R.620a.
http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/tex ... Dei)%2Fdw1

ἰδέσθαι can't be anything but aorist and it simply can't be aorist passive. Aorist passive infinitives always end in -ῆναι.
Bill Walderman

RandyGibbons
Textkit Enthusiast
Posts: 465
Joined: Sat Mar 30, 2013 9:10 pm

Re: Is there a ready way to distinguish ἰδέσθαι med or pas?

Post by RandyGibbons »

You're right, Hylander, (you were clear on this, I wasn't), not even in form can ἰδέσθαι be passive.

Post Reply