In church today the first reading was Isaias (Isaiah) 42:10-16
42:10 was given in English as:
Sing to the Lord a new song, his praise from the end of the Earth! Let the sea roar and all that fills it, the coastlands and their inhabitants.
I usually follow the readings in Latin. However the Latin from my Weber-Grysson (5th edition) gives
Cantate Domino canticum novum, laus ejus ab extremis terrae, qui descenditis in mare, et plenitudo ejus; insulae, et habitatores earum.
Which makes no reference to a roaring sea.
No variants are indicated in the footnotes on the Weber-Grysson text.
However a Google search for the english : 'Let the sea roar' yields: Psalm 98:7
Can anyone suggest what's going on here?
Isaias 42:10
-
- Textkit Zealot
- Posts: 2090
- Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2013 10:15 pm
Re: Isaias 42:10
There are a number of different versions of the Latin Bible--not just textual variants, but versions that are substantially different from one another in various passages. Some of the Latin versions are translations of the Greek Septuagint, which differs in many respects from the Masoretic text of the Hebrew scriptures (the version of the Hebrew text that was established around 800-900 CE, which is the standard Hebrew text of the Jewish tradition). It's well known that the Masoretic version differs in some respects from other versions that circulated in antiquity, and some Latin versions may have been made in antiquity from Hebrew texts that differ from the Masoretic text. So there may be different English texts that can be traced back to different versions of the Hebrew text.
-
- Textkit Enthusiast
- Posts: 527
- Joined: Tue Jun 04, 2013 12:23 pm
Re: Isaias 42:10
I only did a quick search but the Masoretic text, the Septuagint and the Vulgata all seem to agree on "qui descenditis in mare".
The only "explanation" I found for "Let the sea roar" is the following :
The only "explanation" I found for "Let the sea roar" is the following :
The "Cn" is explained as follows on their website :NRSV Bible wrote:Sing to the Lord a new song,
his praise from the end of the earth!
Let the sea roar[a] and all that fills it,
the coastlands and their inhabitants.
Footnotes:
a. Isaiah 42:10 Cn Compare Ps 96.11; 98.7: Heb Those who go down to the sea
Maybe their translation is supported by some manuscript tradition but as they do not cite any I doubt it. If this is really the case, I found their tampering with the text quite bold (even if it is based on parallels in the Psalms 96 and 98). It is not as if the Hebrew/Greek/Latin texts does not make sense...NRSV: To the Reader wrote:Occasionally it is evident that the text has suffered in transmission and that none of the versions provides a satisfactory restoration. Here we can only follow the best judgment of competent scholars as to the most probable reconstruction of the original text. Such reconstructions are indicated in footnotes by the abbreviation Cn ("Correction"), and a translation of the Masoretic Text is added.
-
- Textkit Zealot
- Posts: 2090
- Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2013 10:15 pm
Re: Isaias 42:10
The Latin version quoted by pmda doesn't seem grammatically coherent:
laus ejus ab extremis terrae, qui descenditis in mare, et plenitudo ejus
laus is nominative, but there is no verb of which it could be the subject.
Then a 2d plur. relative clause follows: qui descenditis in mare -- "[you] who go down into the sea". One would expect an imperative, but cantate is separated by the puzzling laus ejus ab extremis terrae.
And the next phrase, et plenitudo ejus, also seems stranded--is it parallel to qui descenditis in mare? Is it a subject of cantate?
What follows, insulae, et habitatores earum, also seems to be a subject of cantate, left stranded by the laus ejus phrase.
In sum, if the Latin version is an accurate reflection of the Hebrew text, something seems amiss here, and perhaps that's why the NRSV resorted to textual emendation (maybe on the basis of the Dead Sea Scrolls?). There is probably a discussion of this passage somewhere in the scholarly literature.
laus ejus ab extremis terrae, qui descenditis in mare, et plenitudo ejus
laus is nominative, but there is no verb of which it could be the subject.
Then a 2d plur. relative clause follows: qui descenditis in mare -- "[you] who go down into the sea". One would expect an imperative, but cantate is separated by the puzzling laus ejus ab extremis terrae.
And the next phrase, et plenitudo ejus, also seems stranded--is it parallel to qui descenditis in mare? Is it a subject of cantate?
What follows, insulae, et habitatores earum, also seems to be a subject of cantate, left stranded by the laus ejus phrase.
In sum, if the Latin version is an accurate reflection of the Hebrew text, something seems amiss here, and perhaps that's why the NRSV resorted to textual emendation (maybe on the basis of the Dead Sea Scrolls?). There is probably a discussion of this passage somewhere in the scholarly literature.
- bedwere
- Global Moderator
- Posts: 5110
- Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 10:23 pm
- Location: Didacopoli in California
- Contact:
Re: Isaias 42:10
I think that qui discendistis in mare and insulae, et habitatores earum are all vocatives.
Compare also with Is 42:11
11 Sublevetur desertum et civitates ejus.
In domibus habitabit Cedar :
laudate, habitatores petræ ;
de vertice montium clamabunt.
Compare also with Is 42:11
11 Sublevetur desertum et civitates ejus.
In domibus habitabit Cedar :
laudate, habitatores petræ ;
de vertice montium clamabunt.
Corrections are welcome (especially for projects).
Blogger Profile My library at the Internet Archive
Meae editiones librorum. Αἱ ἐμαὶ ἐκδόσεις βίβλων.
Blogger Profile My library at the Internet Archive
Meae editiones librorum. Αἱ ἐμαὶ ἐκδόσεις βίβλων.
-
- Textkit Zealot
- Posts: 1341
- Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2010 5:15 am
Re: Isaias 42:10
I was thinking they are vocatives also - how about this as a translation:
Cantate Domino canticum novum, laus ejus ab extremis terrae, qui descenditis in mare, et plenitudo ejus; insulae, et habitatores earum.
Sing to the Lord a new song, his praise from the ends of the earth, [you] who go down to the sea, and all of its plenty, the islands and you who dwell in them.
is that really so incoherent..?
Paul MacD
Cantate Domino canticum novum, laus ejus ab extremis terrae, qui descenditis in mare, et plenitudo ejus; insulae, et habitatores earum.
Sing to the Lord a new song, his praise from the ends of the earth, [you] who go down to the sea, and all of its plenty, the islands and you who dwell in them.
is that really so incoherent..?
Paul MacD
-
- Textkit Zealot
- Posts: 1341
- Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2010 5:15 am
Re: Isaias 42:10
A friend of mine sent me this comment.
I found the link earlier today.
The Greek and Hebrew both a text similar in meaning to the Latin.
Let the sea roar is not in any of them.
The Hebrew does look a bit awkward, and it seems that the English text you cite
has been expanded on the basis of the psalms i.e. Ps 96.11 and 98.7.
This is the Hebrew text
שִׁירוּ לַיהוָה שִׁיר חָדָשׁ תְּהִלָּתוֹ מִקְצֵה הָאָרֶץ; יוֹרְדֵי
.הַיָּם וּמְלֹאוֹ, אִיִּים וְיֹשְׁבֵיהֶם
I make this mean literally:
Sing (plural imperative) to YHWH a new song, his song of praise from the end of the earth,
goers down of the sea and its fullness, islands and their inhabitants.
This doesn't seem to make very good sense and the translators of the NRSV seem to have used
the Psalms to imporove it.
I found the link earlier today.
The Greek and Hebrew both a text similar in meaning to the Latin.
Let the sea roar is not in any of them.
The Hebrew does look a bit awkward, and it seems that the English text you cite
has been expanded on the basis of the psalms i.e. Ps 96.11 and 98.7.
This is the Hebrew text
שִׁירוּ לַיהוָה שִׁיר חָדָשׁ תְּהִלָּתוֹ מִקְצֵה הָאָרֶץ; יוֹרְדֵי
.הַיָּם וּמְלֹאוֹ, אִיִּים וְיֹשְׁבֵיהֶם
I make this mean literally:
Sing (plural imperative) to YHWH a new song, his song of praise from the end of the earth,
goers down of the sea and its fullness, islands and their inhabitants.
This doesn't seem to make very good sense and the translators of the NRSV seem to have used
the Psalms to imporove it.
-
- Textkit Member
- Posts: 153
- Joined: Tue May 27, 2008 1:43 am
- Location: Lilburn, Ga.
Re: Isaias 42:10
Read the introduction and the preface - I believe these will provide you with a clearer explaination regarding the various translations.
Deus me ducet, non ratio.
Observito Quam Educatio Melius Est.
Observito Quam Educatio Melius Est.