Books not remotely accademic:

Post Reply
daivid
Administrator
Posts: 2744
Joined: Sat Jul 16, 2011 1:51 pm
Location: ὁ τοῦ βασιλέως λίθος, London, Europe
Contact:

Books not remotely accademic:

Post by daivid »

Pen and Sword unashamedly produce popular history. They do occasionally produce more serious reprints but “Eager for Glory” on the Elder Drusus by Lindsay Powell is not one of those. So why am I glad I read it. First off the Elder Drusus is one of key leaders of the early empire and this book being readable has ensured that exactly who he was has been cemented in my brain.
Given that most of ancient writings that covered Drusus are lost it is surprising that he has found enough material. All we know of the battle near Tridentum against the Rhaetians is a single line of Cassius Dio
For these reasons, then, Augustus first sent against them Drusus, who speedily routed a detachment of them which came to meet him near the Tridentine mountains, and in consequence received the rank of praetor.
Somehow though he pads it out to three pages. He does this by assuming that by the time of the battle the Rhaetians had adopted the customs of the surrounding Gauls. This is plausible but it is also plausible that they would strive to keep their distinctness preserving their old traditions which according to Livy derive from the Etruscans.
However Powell having decided they are Gauls weaves into his account of the battle things we know about how Gauls fought their battles as if he was reporting this particular battle. These are referenced so we know that he gleans these snippets from the whole Keltic world, from Italy to Britain. But there other things that are not referenced – the basic outline of the battle is suspiciously similar to the Battle of the Sambre. Finally there are graphic details that as far as I can see come from his imagination
The foul stench of blood and gore as men opened their bowels in shock and desperation quickly fill the air
When someone is suggested that ancient historians, such as Herodotus, when they could find out no details of a major event, simply filled out the bare bones they had with imagination others are quick to defend the ancients defense. How could anyone accuse such great writers of dishonesty? The counter argument is that we should not expect ancient writers to live up to modern standards of historical research.
But such an argument is not needed. Powell is perfectly aware of modern standards of history yet he pretty much does all the things Herodotus is suspected of. When faced with threadbare sources he makes it his priority to ensure that the deeds of great men do not fade from memory even if those deeds may well not be the actual deeds of those great men.
For such an illustration Powell has my gratitude.
λονδον

Ronolio
Textkit Member
Posts: 116
Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 6:44 pm

Re: Books not remotely accademic:

Post by Ronolio »

I just discovered Pen and Sword press and quite frankly have enjoyed everything I have purchased published by them. Why? Because they are not remotely academic, but deal with something I greatly enjoy and like to enjoy without straining my brain. I read enough dry academic material in Graduate school and mayhap I will return to that someday. I still occasionally pick my academic journals collection list and look for an article or two to read for my own enlightenment, but these publications I can curl up with and relax reading. I also often find a way of explaining events to my students in the books that won't bore them to tears. So kudos to them for keeping a fascinating period alive and well.

daivid
Administrator
Posts: 2744
Joined: Sat Jul 16, 2011 1:51 pm
Location: ὁ τοῦ βασιλέως λίθος, London, Europe
Contact:

Re: Books not remotely accademic:

Post by daivid »

Ronolio wrote:I just discovered Pen and Sword press and quite frankly have enjoyed everything I have purchased published by them. Why? Because they are not remotely academic, but deal with something I greatly enjoy and like to enjoy without straining my brain. I read enough dry academic material in Graduate school and mayhap I will return to that someday. I still occasionally pick my academic journals collection list and look for an article or two to read for my own enlightenment, but these publications I can curl up with and relax reading. I also often find a way of explaining events to my students in the books that won't bore them to tears. So kudos to them for keeping a fascinating period alive and well.
That is all certainly true. And it is certainly true that Herodotus has survived up to today because he like Pen and Sword has put telling a good story above academic reliability. For me though they do take it to extreme. The bit that especially I have a problem with is that they seem to have a policy to exclude doubt as much as possible.

But yes, you are right they are keeping a fascinating period alive and well by being precisely what they are.
λονδον

Post Reply