Which should I learn first?
-
- Textkit Neophyte
- Posts: 49
- Joined: Sun Feb 04, 2007 6:50 pm
- Location: Silicon Valley, CA
- Contact:
Which should I learn first?
I'm planning on learning both Latin and Attic Greek. Should I learn one of them first, or learn them both in conjunction? How long does it take, in general, to learn Latin (or Ancient Greek)?
Thanks in advance.
Thanks in advance.
-
- Textkit Enthusiast
- Posts: 563
- Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2006 9:34 am
-
- Textkit Member
- Posts: 106
- Joined: Sat Mar 11, 2006 2:56 am
If I had done Greek first I'm certain I would've have quit classical languages. Look, Attic Greek is a lovely, lovely language. Really, I often find it more elaborate, more living, and more elegant than Latin. See (this is my view), Greek is an artist's tongue. Its irregular because it strives to be pretty, it's flexible and very subtle, it's more sung than spoken, and again it's so irregular (AHHH). There are just so many tiny rules, like how in the second-person singular aorist imperative middle the accent is on the ultimate UNLESS it's compounded, or how vowels contract in a certain way but sometimes they either contract in a different way or not at all, or how after memorizing all the verb forms you have to deal with -mi verbs, and...
Well, as you can see, I sort of hate Greek right now, but Latin is such an engineer's language. It's SO regular and so nice and perfect. Greek appears as a much more living language, but learning Latin is so much easier it's absurd, or at least it was for me. That's why I say learn Latin first, because it's easier to get your mind around reading a classical language when you don't have to worry about why the goddamn accent on the omega in ωστε isn't a circumflex despite the fact the rule says it's supposed to be.
Well, as you can see, I sort of hate Greek right now, but Latin is such an engineer's language. It's SO regular and so nice and perfect. Greek appears as a much more living language, but learning Latin is so much easier it's absurd, or at least it was for me. That's why I say learn Latin first, because it's easier to get your mind around reading a classical language when you don't have to worry about why the goddamn accent on the omega in ωστε isn't a circumflex despite the fact the rule says it's supposed to be.
-
- Textkit Neophyte
- Posts: 49
- Joined: Sun Feb 04, 2007 6:50 pm
- Location: Silicon Valley, CA
- Contact:
@Agrippa
@Chris Weimer
Unfortunately, I probably don't have the time to do both simultaneously. I don't know how long it will take to learn Latin, though (estimates, anyone?).
You say that there are upsides to learning Greek first. What are these upsides?
I've been looking through the D'ooge's (sp?) Latin For Beginners, and it makes the pronunciation look somewhat complicated. There are little accent marks all over the place. When I browse 'round this forum and look at what people write in Latin, though, I don't see all those weird marks. I find this difference somewhat confusing; it may be that I haven't even started learning, though.That's why I say learn Latin first, because it's easier to get your mind around reading a classical language when you don't have to worry about why the goddamn accent on the omega in ωστε isn't a circumflex despite the fact the rule says it's supposed to be.
@Chris Weimer
Unfortunately, I probably don't have the time to do both simultaneously. I don't know how long it will take to learn Latin, though (estimates, anyone?).
You say that there are upsides to learning Greek first. What are these upsides?
-
- Textkit Member
- Posts: 106
- Joined: Sat Mar 11, 2006 2:56 am
I have never read D'ooge's (I've got only love for Wheelock's), but I wouldn't worry about it. They're probably for vowel length, and the only time I bother with that is when I'm reading poetry, and then it comes naturally. The best part of Greek is that they always mark their vowel length (thank you omega and eta!)
Also the pronounciation of Greek is much more complicated; it has a pitch accent and I've got two books with conflicting pronounciations of the zeta.
Also the pronounciation of Greek is much more complicated; it has a pitch accent and I've got two books with conflicting pronounciations of the zeta.
-
- Textkit Enthusiast
- Posts: 563
- Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2006 9:34 am
The upside of learning Greek is that so much of Latin is built ontop of that. Indeed, even Marcus Aurelius was still writing in Greek for his theological works (Meditations). It's not absolutely mandatory, but certainly helpful to be familiar with Greek literature before embarking on Latin literature.
-
- Textkit Enthusiast
- Posts: 609
- Joined: Tue Oct 15, 2002 12:34 am
- Location: Adelaide, Australia
I did Latin first, then Greek, but at the university I am now attending they do both languages together for the first semester. This way you get a good grounding in the concepts behind both languages.
In hindsight I think it would have been better to do both at once, or Greek first. Greek is only harder for the first week or two while you learn to read and write in a different alphabet (not as hard as it looks!), after that it seems to flow along quite well. The verbs are a pain but all languages have their hurdle (like non-phonetic spelling in English!). The prose is certainly much more exciting and varied, although that may be partly due to the accident of history and what endured over time.
In hindsight I think it would have been better to do both at once, or Greek first. Greek is only harder for the first week or two while you learn to read and write in a different alphabet (not as hard as it looks!), after that it seems to flow along quite well. The verbs are a pain but all languages have their hurdle (like non-phonetic spelling in English!). The prose is certainly much more exciting and varied, although that may be partly due to the accident of history and what endured over time.
-
- Textkit Zealot
- Posts: 903
- Joined: Sun Dec 12, 2004 3:37 am
- Location: Mountain View
If you really want to learn the languages, you can. Don't let the difficulty let you down!
And pick the language with the literature that is more appealing to you ... if you don't know much about the literature of either language, read some stuff in translation ... but you need only glance at my username to know which language I'm biased towards
And pick the language with the literature that is more appealing to you ... if you don't know much about the literature of either language, read some stuff in translation ... but you need only glance at my username to know which language I'm biased towards
-
- Textkit Neophyte
- Posts: 49
- Joined: Sun Feb 04, 2007 6:50 pm
- Location: Silicon Valley, CA
- Contact:
-
- Textkit Fan
- Posts: 218
- Joined: Sun Sep 24, 2006 2:46 pm
You may be interested in some recent discussion on this topic.
- IreneY
- Textkit Zealot
- Posts: 800
- Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2006 8:27 am
- Location: U.S.A (not American though)
- Contact:
It may seem strange but I recommend you go with Latin first if you find trying both too dificult. I am of course heavily biased toward Greek for any number of reasons (not the least being that I learnt Ancient Greek before Latin -what a surprise eh?). However I still remember how shocked I was with the regularity of Latin. My mom sweared she would record the "no there's NO exeption to the rule" reply of hers as well as the "yes, that's it" one and I also remember, being an absolutely weird person, delving into the Latin language certain that I would at some point find something so complicated as some of the rules of the Greek but alas! nothing came close.
In other words, Greek is absolutely wonderful if you take my word for it (which you shouldn't since, when talking about languages my objectivity goes out the window) but rather more difficult than Latin, especially if you decide to find out how you should pronounce it so that your pronunciation will be as acurate as possible
In other words, Greek is absolutely wonderful if you take my word for it (which you shouldn't since, when talking about languages my objectivity goes out the window) but rather more difficult than Latin, especially if you decide to find out how you should pronounce it so that your pronunciation will be as acurate as possible
Last edited by IreneY on Mon Feb 05, 2007 7:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Textkit Neophyte
- Posts: 49
- Joined: Sun Feb 04, 2007 6:50 pm
- Location: Silicon Valley, CA
- Contact:
I should have done a search before posting this thread, eh?Didymus wrote:You may be interested in some recent discussion on this topic.
I'm too easily swayed. Pienso que empezaré con LatÃn porqué ya conozco un poco español. Does that look like a good enough reason to start with Latin and then learn Greek afterwards?It may seem strange but I recommend you go with Latin first if you find trying both too dificult.
- IreneY
- Textkit Zealot
- Posts: 800
- Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2006 8:27 am
- Location: U.S.A (not American though)
- Contact:
-
- Textkit Neophyte
- Posts: 53
- Joined: Mon Jan 15, 2007 6:52 pm
- Location: USA
- Contact:
-
- Textkit Neophyte
- Posts: 36
- Joined: Sat Jan 06, 2007 11:30 pm
You know what's surprising? German has a very similar pronunciation to Latin. Consider the name Michael. In Latin you'd say Mee-Kai-Ul. In German you'd say Mee-Chai(ch as in loch)-Ul. However, pronunciation is where the similarities seem to stop.EgoIoYoEu wrote:She's right, you know. I know Spanish, and the similarities are striking. Of course, Spanish's grandaddy is Latin, so....it has "inherited" certain traits. I'm thinking of the imperfect and preterit verb tenses especially. Nearly identical!
-
- Textkit Neophyte
- Posts: 49
- Joined: Sun Feb 04, 2007 6:50 pm
- Location: Silicon Valley, CA
- Contact:
Illegal? What is this?!SPAM DELETED (by mod)
There's always the possibility that I could confuse the two; that might be somewhat of a problem.To me? Absolutely! You'll go "hey that's just like in Spanish" quite often. The trick is of course not to confuse the two but then that's less of a problem with Sp-Lt than Spanish-Italian for example
-
- Textkit Neophyte
- Posts: 53
- Joined: Mon Jan 15, 2007 6:52 pm
- Location: USA
- Contact:
-
- Textkit Zealot
- Posts: 3399
- Joined: Fri Jan 03, 2003 4:55 pm
- Location: Madison, WI, USA
- Contact:
Yes. Please don't quote the spam-weasels. I'll obliterate these posts when I notice them.
William S. Annis — http://www.aoidoi.org/ — http://www.scholiastae.org/
τίς πατέρ' αἰνήσει εἰ μὴ κακοδαίμονες υἱοί;
τίς πατέρ' αἰνήσει εἰ μὴ κακοδαίμονες υἱοί;
-
- Textkit Zealot
- Posts: 764
- Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2005 10:40 pm
- Location: In a van down by the river
Where do you get that Ul? I've never heard that.Voxforascausa wrote:Consider the name Michael. In Latin you'd say Mee-Kai-Ul.
Lisa: Relax?! I can't relax! Nor can I yield, relent, or... Only two synonyms? Oh my God! I'm losing my perspicacity! Aaaaa!
Homer: Well it's always in the last place you look.
Homer: Well it's always in the last place you look.
-
- Textkit Neophyte
- Posts: 36
- Joined: Sat Jan 06, 2007 11:30 pm
-
- Textkit Enthusiast
- Posts: 563
- Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2006 9:34 am
-
- Textkit Neophyte
- Posts: 49
- Joined: Sun Feb 04, 2007 6:50 pm
- Location: Silicon Valley, CA
- Contact:
-
- Textkit Member
- Posts: 106
- Joined: Sat Mar 11, 2006 2:56 am
Well, you could look it up, or you could memorize where the stress is. I know from memorization that the first e in Salvete is long, but I also know it's pronounced salvéte, so I would know that that vowel must be long even if I had forgotten that the second e was long. If it were sálvete, I'd know for sure the e was short, but a second conjugation always has the second-person plural imperative active with -Ete and never -ete.retypepassword wrote:I don't think my questions belong here anymore (perhaps in another forum), but how can I tell when I'm supposed to pronounce a long vowel or a short one?
Ex: Salvete:
Where's the long vowel and where's the short vowel? Is there some rule for this?
- Lucus Eques
- Textkit Zealot
- Posts: 2037
- Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2004 12:52 pm
- Location: Pennsylvania
- Contact: